[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Service Provider NetFlow Collectors
Hi Tim,
That absolutely depends on the amount of TAGs you use, and how you
aggregate, etc.
I am collecting DSTAS, SRCAS, en DST AS per IP. And influx is not even
sweating a single drop....
We have a 4 Tbps of traffic during peak, and as well as pmacct and
influxdb or running very very smooth.
(With the mentioned aggregations I can see what a single customer costs
with Transit, Peering and IX (per IP even if needed) )
And dst AS per port/description/ethernet name
From your mail i derive that you just pushed everything to influx from
flows, you have to be a bit smarter with the layout, aggregations and
continuous queries.
(collect what you need)
On 02-01-19 13:08, Tim Raphael wrote:
> I would advise against InfluxDB in this case - flow data has a very
> high (and open) tag cardinality which is not suited to Influx
> (although their recently new index format has improved this).
>
> Iâ??m currently pushing sFlow through Pmacct â??> Kafka â??> Clickhouse
> (columnar store) with a summing merge tree database engine.
> Clickhouse is very fast for queries across columns as well as
> aggregating down them (e.g. summing number of bytes).
>
> For example this is the results of a query of nearly a yearâ??s worth of
> MAC-to-MAC flows (7-tuple) queried for the last 7 days between two
> given sets of MACs:
> /
> /
> /2016 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.208 sec. Processed 17.56 million rows,
> 1.03 GB (84.51 million rows/s., 4.97 GB/s.)/
> /
> /
> There is also a Grafana datasource plugin for Clickhouse :)
> /
> /
> /- /Tim
>
>
>> On 2 Jan 2019, at 7:50 pm, H I Baysal <hibaysal at gmail.com
>> <mailto:hibaysal at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> PMACCT (Works Awesome)
>> push to influxdb ( Works awesome)
>>
>> With some custom scripts to add/match interface descriptions. And you
>> can query whatever you want in grafana :D
>> And grafana has a nice API for rendering a dashboardgraph to a PNG
>> and you can send this png to whatever chat/bot or mail you want.
>>
>> And all for free with 99% of accuracy.
>>
>> (Mucho gracias to Paulo :D )
>>
>>
>> On 01-01-19 05:56, Avi Freedman wrote:
>>> We do have a minimum for commercial service that's more like
>>> $1500/mo but we are coming out with a free tier in Q1 with lower
>>> retention (among other deltas, but including fully slice and dice
>>> flow analytics +BGP that it sounded like Erik might be looking for).
>>>
>>> Feel free to ping me if anyone would like to help us test the free
>>> tier in January.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Avi Freedman
>>> CEO, Kentik
>>>
>>>> Doesn't Kentik cost like $2000 a month minimum?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM Matthew Crocker
>>>> <matthew at corp.crocker.com <mailto:matthew at corp.crocker.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Â +1 Kentik as well, Â DDoS, RTBH, Netflow. Â Cloud based so I don't
>>>>> have to
>>>>> worry about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/31/18, 11:37 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Bryan Holloway" <
>>>>> nanog-bounces at nanog.org <mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf
>>>>> of bryan at shout.net <mailto:bryan at shout.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â +1 Kentik ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â We've been using their DDoS/RTBH mitigation with good success.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 12/31/18 3:52 AM, Eric Lindsjö wrote:
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > Hi,
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > We use kentik and we're very happy. Works great, tons of new
>>>>> features
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > coming along all the time. Going to start looking into ddos
>>>>> detection
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > and mitigation soon.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > Would recommend.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > Kind regards,
>>>>>     > Eric Lindsjö
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >
>>>>> Â Â Â Â > On 12/31/2018 04:29 AM, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Hi Nanogâ?¦.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> We are looking at replacing our Netflow collector. I am
>>>>> wonder what
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> other service providers are using to collect netflow data
>>>>> off their
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Core and Edge Routers. Pros/Consâ?¦ What to watch out for any
>>>>> info
>>>>> would
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> help.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> We are mainly looking to analyze the netflow data. Bonus if
>>>>> it does
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> ddos detection and mitigation.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> We are looking at
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> ManageEngine Netflow Analyzer
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> PRTG
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Plixer â?? Scrutinizer
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> PeakFlow
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Kentik
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Solarwinds NTA
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Thanks in advanceâ?¦
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> Erik
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any
>>>>> documents,
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> confidential information that is legally privileged. If you
>>>>> are not
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> the intended recipient, or a person responsible for
>>>>> delivering it
>>>>> to
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> copying, distribution or use of any of the information
>>>>> contained in
>>>>> or
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If
>>>>> you have
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> received this transmission in error please notify the sender
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the
>>>>> original
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> transmission and its attachments without reading or saving
>>>>> in any
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >> manner. Thank you.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190102/64f222ef/attachment.html>