QoS for Office365

[mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)]

On 9/Jul/19 16:37, Valdis Kl Ä? tnieks wrote:

> I'll bite.
>
> It's one thing to verify that no routers molested the QoS bits along the
> packet path.
>
> But how did you verify they "worked" as far as actually dropping packets off
> the correct flow (especially since if you have a high-priority QoS, the flow that
> loses may be some other customer's flow)?

With some things, you need to have faith until you are given a reason
not to.

Just like when you are back in 26K and the Captain and his First Officer
are up front :-).

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190709/6b575e44/attachment.sig>