[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

44/8

Subject: 44/8
From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:07:40 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAP-guGVdY-8LSKv1VShSQHOrKo-kPwX8p0PKONbt3vx4uUP-Qw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP-guGXkT9O_sB5yhZP5XtjkDkz4MQctg-Vdqj33ofYRYTeXeQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGVdY-8LSKv1VShSQHOrKo-kPwX8p0PKONbt3vx4uUP-Qw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:04 PM William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:56 AM andrew.brant via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Whatever happened to the entire class E block? I know it's reserved for
>> future use, but sounds like that future is now given that we've exhausted
>> all existing allocations.
>>
>
> The IPv6 loonies killed all IETF proposals to convert it to unicast space.
> It remains reserved/unusable.
>

I should clarify: I see IPv6 advocates and IPv6 loonies. The difference
between the advocates and the loonies is that the loonies want to
force-fail IPv4 to "encourage" the move to IPv6.

-Bill


-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190722/a10d8c92/attachment.html>

References:
- 44/8
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- 44/8
  - From: andrew.brant at me.com (andrew.brant)
- 44/8
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

Prev by Date: 44/8
Next by Date: 44/8
Previous by thread: 44/8
Next by thread: 44/8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread