[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google peering in LAX
- Subject: Google peering in LAX
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:35:14 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CABTdvP+vnSik0E7eQGpU8=WF1oDsVR+vzO9N87Ce370o8UQiMA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CABTdvP+vnSik0E7eQGpU8=WF1oDsVR+vzO9N87Ce370o8UQiMA@mail.gmail.com>
Yesâ?¦ Thatâ??s correct.
Owen
> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:20 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo at slabnet.com> wrote:
>
> I believe Owen was referring here to Google's actions: that the disagg is the antisocial behaviour and that transit providers (the people they are paying) would be more tolerant of that antisocial behaviour than would be peers (the people they are not paying).
>
> On Mon., Mar. 2, 2020, 13:19 Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us <mailto:sethm at rollernet.us>> wrote:
> On 3/2/20 12:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > In part, it might be because people youâ??re not paying may be less tolerant of anti-social behavior than people you are paying.
> >
>
> I'm not sure how I was being offensive but OK.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200302/96933057/attachment.html>