Google peering in LAX

[xenith at xenith.org (Justin Seabrook-Rocha)]

You hit the nail on the head. Google only seems to announce a subset of their routes to the route servers, but does announce all routes (for some definition of â??allâ??) to direct peers. I notice this every time I turn up a new IX and traffic heads off onto my backbone instead of the local IX.

I did a spot check and I get that /24 via my direct peering (along with the /16).

Justin Seabrook-Rocha
-- 
Xenith || xenith at xenith.org || http://xenith.org/



> On Mar 2, 2020, at 12:40, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> 
> Anyone know why Google announces only aggregates via peering and disaggregate prefixes over transit?
> 
> For example, I had a customer complaining about a path that was taking the long way instead of via peering and when I looked I saw:
> 
> Only 172.217.0.0/16 over Any2 LAX
> 
> That plus 172.217.14.0/24 over transit
> 
> Any inquiries to Google just get a generic "we're not setting up any new peering but we're on route servers" response for almost a year now. Or is it because they don't send the /24's to route servers and I'm stuck until they finish their forever improvement project to turn up a direct neighbor?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200302/c8fc2a1d/attachment.html>