[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
WIKI documentation Software?
- Subject: WIKI documentation Software?
- From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:23:41 +1100
- In-reply-to: <CAJ=P5abd8LO1uLHV4C-POq8qXTFbUg7LnR2sUfw85qVQS1qRJA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJ=P5abd8LO1uLHV4C-POq8qXTFbUg7LnR2sUfw85qVQS1qRJA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 08:07 -0400, Craig wrote:
> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save
> documentation to /
> how to's for staff, etc.
Like any other software, make a set of requirements and then go
looking. The order of those two steps is important, though you're
allowed to iterate.
Remember to match the requirements to the people who will actually be
using the thing, not the people who will be managing it :-)
Personally I think the plethora of formatting options in things like
Confluence tends to distract people into spending vast amounts of time
getting their pages to look just right, that would have been better
spent capturing more actual information. Or it makes them avoid adding
information because it's too hard, or it takes too long, or it invites
odious comparisons with other people's entries.
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389
GPG fingerprint: 2561 E9EC D868 E73C 8AF1Â 49CF EE50 4B1D CCA1 5170
Old fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862Â 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D