[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
WIKI documentation Software?
- Subject: WIKI documentation Software?
- From: cvuljanic at gmail.com (Craig)
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:34:06 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAHnk=CgkX7pKAXaLCRHYBYX2i6SxObv884s7+LeM96H-kg4NJw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJ=P5abd8LO1uLHV4C-POq8qXTFbUg7LnR2sUfw85qVQS1qRJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHnk=CgkX7pKAXaLCRHYBYX2i6SxObv884s7+LeM96H-kg4NJw@mail.gmail.com>
Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,
Weâ??ve managed to avoid using that.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <nicholas.oas at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint.
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <cvuljanic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to
>> / how to's for staff, etc.
>>
>> pro's
>> con's
>>
>> We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced
>> before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.
>>
>> thanks;
>>
>> CPV
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200314/5dd7d7ef/attachment.html>