[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network

Subject: Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
From: ben at 6by7.net (Ben Cannon)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 23:21:37 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAKPeJESJza-bgkGHr6u+K5mifY1KXPjniUEY8fGQH7nTaXLCuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEnbXKur9YdLytuZ__694eonKWB1ExX7YG_OFmuUrtTsoEcF9A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKPeJESJza-bgkGHr6u+K5mifY1KXPjniUEY8fGQH7nTaXLCuQ@mail.gmail.com>

oops. missed a spot.

-Ben Cannon
CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC 
ben at 6by7.net <mailto:ben at 6by7.net>




> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:36 PM, David Burns <davburns at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Did you compare CERNET with commodity networks?  (My anecdotal observations from a couple years ago suggest that Internet2 to CERNET is very good when other paths are poor to unusable.)
> 
> --David Burns

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200315/5e0126b6/attachment.html>

References:
- China’s Slow Transnational Network
  - From: pzhu011 at ucr.edu (Pengxiong Zhu)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
  - From: davburns at gmail.com (David Burns)

Prev by Date: Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
Next by Date: COVID-19 vs. our Networks
Previous by thread: Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
Next by thread: Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread