COVID-19 vs. our Networks

[sronan at ronan-online.com (sronan at ronan-online.com)]

https://hgis.uw.edu/virus

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 16, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Le 16/03/2020 à 20:08, Owen DeLong a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>>>> On Mar 16, 2020, at 07:04 , Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Le 16/03/2020 à 14:58, Mark Tinka a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 15/Mar/20 00:12, Eric M. Carroll wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is good news here. The infrastructure has never been better
>>>>>> positioned to support this kind of mass event. We can shop from home,
>>>>>> work from home, get groceries from home, order drugs, get
>>>>>> entertainment, all via IP. The ISP community needs to be ready to
>>>>>> respond to the magnitude of what is happening.
>>>>> If the Internet was as large in 2003 when SARS hit as it is now in 2020
>>>>> under the Coronavirus, I think we'd have seen the same issues back then.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nowadays, information gets around a lot faster and with more fuss and
>>>>> fanfare than before. On average, by the time you see a shared video clip
>>>>> on WhatsApp, you'll be receiving it from 100 other contacts inside of a
>>>>> 30 minutes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As readier as the Internet is today, part of the mega spread of the
>>>>> fallout from the Coronavirus is because information is not only
>>>>> traveling way faster, a lot of it is also not (necessarily) verified or
>>>>> moderated before being shared with is consumers.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> There is no other way to do that information filterning now. Nobody has any authority of knowing better than others.
>>> 
>>> This simply isnâ??t trueâ?¦
>>> 
>>> Listen to qualified medical professionals, especially those who specialize in infectious diseases and epidemiology.
>> 
>> Doctors are many.  Some speak urgent: they say stay home.
>> 
>> Others say this, and yet others say that.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The information on the CDC and WHO websites remains the primary source of trustworthy information. It may be
>> incomplete, but if someone is contradicting something there, theyâ??re very likely to be wrong.
> 
> Stay home.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> OTOH, anyone selling â??survive COVIDâ?? or â??cure COVIDâ?? etc. is completely untrustworthy and guaranteed to be lying to
>> you in order to sell a product. Despicable, but common place.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Thereâ??s no authoritative way to get false information off the internet, so we have to combat it as best we can with good
>> information and education. Even in my own household, this is a constant battle as my GF continues to bring home
>> odd superstitious rumors and embellishments from a variety of inaccurate sources and I constantly have to correct her
>> perspective.
>> 
>> For up to date local information, check with the local public health authority in your jurisdiction.
> 
> I tell you I did.  There is 0 info from official channels telling where precisely are the cases.  I had to google the cityname and the virus word.
> 
> The official information here says number of cases, and names the REgions most affected (large regions).  Thats it.
> 
> Please tell me about your city: do you know the numbers in your city?  How did you get the info?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> In the US, that will usually
>> be your county public health agency. In some cases, individual municipalities also have public health departments.
> 
> Please try it and tell me if it works.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> At the very least adhere to their orders and recommendations.
> 
> YEs I do.  It says this: tomorrow noon all stay  indoors, out only for pharmacy, alimentaiton or criticial job.  Thats it.
> 
> They also use other words that I will not type here.
> 
> Alex
> 
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200316/ba288cf9/attachment.html>