[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

UDP/123 policers & status

Subject: UDP/123 policers & status
From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:14:08 +0200
In-reply-to: <CAD6AjGRHDDG4k_xJmYEjc4abNNYn3UChcax8mTNd9RrK3pyy+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGRHDDG4k_xJmYEjc4abNNYn3UChcax8mTNd9RrK3pyy+A@mail.gmail.com>


On 17/Mar/20 18:05, Ca By wrote:

>
>
>
> +1 , still see, still have policers
>
> Fyi, ipv6 ntp / udp tends to have a much higher success rate getting
> through cgn / policers / ...

For those that have come in as attacks toward customers, we've
"scrubbed" them where there has been interest.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200317/64ce2aaa/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: stevesommarsntp at gmail.com (Steven Sommars)

References:
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: Rich.Compton at charter.com (Compton, Rich A)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)

Prev by Date: COVID-19 vs. our Networks
Next by Date: DHS letters for fuel and facility access
Previous by thread: UDP/123 policers & status
Next by thread: UDP/123 policers & status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread