[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
UDP/123 policers & status
- Subject: UDP/123 policers & status
- From: ragge at kth.se (Ragnar Sundblad)
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 00:00:53 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CA+2UFhmMt_c33Z8Gigw24rqnUWNzrsG=mSHKecMW-++cimLaBA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CA+2UFhmMt_c33Z8Gigw24rqnUWNzrsG=mSHKecMW-++cimLaBA@mail.gmail.com>
> On 28 Mar 2020, at 23:29, Bottiger <bottiger10 at gmail.com> wrote:
...
> Broken protocols need to be removed and blacklisted at every edge.
A protocol isnâ??t broken just because it can be abused when spoofed,
it is abused. Even TCP can be abused in that way.
Should we blacklist and remove TCP?
> Pushing the responsibility to BCP38 is unrealistic.
It would help quite a bit against a lot if abuse, and it would be
reasonable to include it on a lowest level of technical level to
actually get to be called an ISP.
So what do the ISP:s want - earn money while doing nothing until the
Internet is unusable? I donâ??t get it.
There are enough threats against the open Internet as it is, we
donâ??t need that too.
Ragnar