[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

UDP/123 policers & status

Subject: UDP/123 policers & status
From: ragge at kth.se (Ragnar Sundblad)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:01:31 +0200
In-reply-to: <CAAeewD_txaKBsai7w3Y-3+sx=O8jsWNvQHMddBGS=CgiHngNUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CA+2UFhmMt_c33Z8Gigw24rqnUWNzrsG=mSHKecMW-++cimLaBA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAeewD_txaKBsai7w3Y-3+sx=O8jsWNvQHMddBGS=CgiHngNUw@mail.gmail.com>


> On 30 Mar 2020, at 08:18, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 01:58, Ragnar Sundblad <ragge at kth.se> wrote:
> 
>> A protocol with varying packet size, as the NTS protected NTP is,
>> can easily have the bad property of having responses larger than the
>> requests if not taken care. Donâ??t you see that?
> 
> Why? Why not pad requests to guarantee attenuation vector until
> authenticity of packets can be verified?

Right, and NTS does that.

Ragnar

Follow-Ups:
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: stenn at nwtime.org (Harlan Stenn)

References:
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: hgm+nanog at ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Hal Murray)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: bottiger10 at gmail.com (Bottiger)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: stenn at nwtime.org (Harlan Stenn)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: ragge at kth.se (Ragnar Sundblad)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: stenn at nwtime.org (Harlan Stenn)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: ragge at kth.se (Ragnar Sundblad)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: stenn at nwtime.org (Harlan Stenn)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: ragge at kth.se (Ragnar Sundblad)
- UDP/123 policers & status
  - From: saku at ytti.fi (Saku Ytti)

Prev by Date: UDP/123 policers & status
Next by Date: UDP/123 policers & status
Previous by thread: UDP/123 policers & status
Next by thread: UDP/123 policers & status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread