Free.fr vs HE.net IPv6 (Was: CISA: Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce)

[merculiani at gmail.com (Matt Erculiani)]

Single homed on Cogent.* is a problem. Their network is known for being
cheap, not resilient. Last time I was involved in a Cogent install for a
customer, all of their distribution devices connected to a SINGLE core at a
major south-central US carrier hotel. True device redundancy required a
wave to another building. Pretty of absurd IMO for a carrier that likes to
play â??holier than thouâ?? with peering.

-Matt

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 9:42 AM Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:

> I did error somewhere, yes. If I didn't read that part, didn't send the
> right link, etc. Not sure.
>
> Yeah, single-homed on Cogent IPv6 is a problem.
>
> Maybe I just assumed that if you had transit from someone, that you got
> IPv4 and IPv6 service with them. Who doesn't do that?
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog at radu-adrian.feurdean.net>
> *To: *"NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Saturday, March 28, 2020 10:22:24 PM
> *Subject: *Free.fr vs HE.net IPv6 (Was: CISA: Guidance on the Essential
> Critical Infrastructure Workforce)
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, at 19:52, Mike Hammett wrote:
> >
> https://radar.qrator.net/as12322/providers#startDate=2019-12-27&endDate=2020-03-27&tab=current
>
> Did you read the part about *IPv6* traffic ?
> Your link points to some IPv*4* relationship. Over IPv6, you get this :
>
>
> https://radar.qrator.net/as12322/ipv6-providers#startDate=2019-12-29&endDate=2020-03-29&tab=current
>
> Note the "Active Now" part, which is only active for Cogent.
>
> And then, rather than taking QRator (which does a good job and has
> interesting information on a number of things - who buys transit from who
> *NOT* being one of those things - or at least not the public information)
> as word of absolute truth, did you test that bgp.he.net thinks about this
> ? Since HE is one of the parties, it does make sense to check their tools
> to see their point of view.
>
> Long story short:
>  - Free.fr in known in France (where I happen to live and work) for only
> having Cogent as a transit for the last few years.
>  - they are also known to peer (like "only exchange own routes and
> customer routes") with some "very big" networks (usually called "tier-1") :
> level3 and zayo among them.
>  - Cogent and HE over IPv6 ... I suppose everybody knows the story.....
>  - Free.fr depeered he.net about one week ago...
>
> There have been some exchanges of tentative traceroutes in both directions
> on FRnOG (French NOG) and things are clear : free.fr and he.net cannot
> exchange IPv6 traffic.
>
> --
Matt Erculiani
ERCUL-ARIN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200330/ec1d4043/attachment.html>