[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Aug 26 11:25:16 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: zvxr ng glqrevn.arg ([vxr [hecul) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Vonage? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Aug 26 11:25:16 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: mike at tyderia.net (Mike Murphy)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00708.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00708.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Vonage?</li>
Matt Smith wrote:
> I've got my Vonage box behind my router. It works just fine.
>
> And, I've got it tied to my inside wiring (as a second line).
> Basically, just wire it in just like where BS hits the inside wiring (or
> anywhere else, really). Depending on your setup, it may be more or less
> complicated - but done correctly you could address the alarm system
> situation too.
>
>
> --Matt
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Woodfield [<a rel="nofollow" href="mailto:rekoil">mailto:rekoil</a> at semihuman.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:54 AM
> To: ale at ale.org
> Subject: [ale] Vonage?
>
>
> OK, now that Speakeasy is offering OneLink, their dialtone-less DSL
> service,
> I'm seriously investigating moving from a BS dialtone line to Vonage
> (the
> fact that I just found out I can keep my phone number doesn't hurt
> either).
> I do have some technical questions, however, and I'm wondering if anyone
> has the
> experience to answer these:
>
> - Is the VoIP adapter able to operate with a NAT'ed IP behind an
> Linux iptables firewall using unmodified MASQUERADE rules, or would one
> need
> to set up a static NAT entry and port forwarding (or *ugh* a public IP)?
>
> - Instead of connecting the phone jack directly to a phone, can one run
> it
> to an existing phone jack and then connect other phones to the inside
> wiring? Would it be necessary to disconnect the pair from the NIU in
> order
> to do this?
>
> TIA,
>
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Mike Murphy
781 Inman Mews Drive Atlanta GA 30307
Landline: 404-653-1070
Mobile: 404-545-6234
Email: mike at tyderia.net
AIM: mmichael453
JDAM: 33:45:14.0584N 84:21:43.038W
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00710" href="msg00710.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mike at tyderia.net (Mike Murphy)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00708" href="msg00708.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> msmith at risklabs.com (Matt Smith)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00708.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00710.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00708.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00710.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00709"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00709"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>