[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



"Can I use your service with my home alarm system?

Yes, you can. But we recommend that you keep a basic telephone line to 
support your home alarm system."

Mike


Mike Murphy wrote:
> well, depending on the alarm. many are connected to the CO so that a 
> fault can be detected (ie, if someone cuts your phone line before the 
> home invasion). If you had the alarm connected to the VoIP box, that 
> wouldn't work.
> 
> Matt Smith wrote:
> 
>> I've got my Vonage box behind my router.  It works just fine.
>>
>> And, I've got it tied to my inside wiring (as a second line).
>> Basically, just wire it in just like where BS hits the inside wiring (or
>> anywhere else, really).  Depending on your setup, it may be more or less
>> complicated - but done correctly you could address the alarm system
>> situation too.
>>
>>
>> --Matt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
&gt;&gt; From: Chris Woodfield [<a  rel="nofollow" href="mailto:rekoil";>mailto:rekoil</a> at semihuman.com] Sent: Thursday, 
&gt;&gt; August 26, 2004 10:54 AM
&gt;&gt; To: ale at ale.org
&gt;&gt; Subject: [ale] Vonage?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; OK, now that Speakeasy is offering OneLink, their dialtone-less DSL
&gt;&gt; service, I'm seriously investigating moving from a BS dialtone line to 
&gt;&gt; Vonage
&gt;&gt; (the fact that I just found out I can keep my phone number doesn't hurt
&gt;&gt; either). I do have some technical questions, however, and I'm 
&gt;&gt; wondering if anyone
&gt;&gt; has the experience to answer these:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; - Is the VoIP adapter able to operate with a NAT'ed IP behind an Linux 
&gt;&gt; iptables firewall using unmodified MASQUERADE rules, or would one
&gt;&gt; need to set up a static NAT entry and port forwarding (or *ugh* a 
&gt;&gt; public IP)?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; - Instead of connecting the phone jack directly to a phone, can one run
&gt;&gt; it to an existing phone jack and then connect other phones to the 
&gt;&gt; inside wiring? Would it be necessary to disconnect the pair from the 
&gt;&gt; NIU in
&gt;&gt; order to do this?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; TIA,
&gt;&gt; -Chris
&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________
&gt;&gt; Ale mailing list
&gt;&gt; Ale at ale.org
&gt;&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 


-- 

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Mike Murphy
781 Inman Mews Drive Atlanta GA 30307
Landline: 404-653-1070
Mobile: 404-545-6234
Email: mike at tyderia.net
AIM: mmichael453
JDAM: 33:45:14.0584N  84:21:43.038W
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00708" href="msg00708.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> msmith at risklabs.com (Matt Smith)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00709" href="msg00709.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mike at tyderia.net (Mike Murphy)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00709.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00711.html">[ale] ALE NW Meeting topic</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00709.html">[ale] Vonage?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00706.html">[ale] router stupids</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00710"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00710"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>