[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]



On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:16:45 -0500
John Wells <jb at devsea.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:54:05 -0500
> James Sumners <james at sumners.ath.cx> wrote:
> 
> > I am considering replacing a Linksys WRT54G with a Linux box. The Linksys is
> > working fine but it doesn't quite cut it. My question to you is, would you
> > recommend Smoothwall 2.0 over IPCop 1.3.0 or vice versa? 
> 
> I used to use Smoothwall, then switched to IPCop.  No opinion either way
> really, although I like the fact that IPCop is community supported and open. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
&gt; <a  rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale";>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>


-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available



</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00077" href="msg00077.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00078" href="msg00078.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jb at devsea.com (John Wells)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00080.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00082.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00080.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00082.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00081"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00081"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>