[no subject]

rgds
-mig

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 21:54, James Sumners wrote:
> I am considering replacing a Linksys WRT54G with a Linux box. The Linksys is
> working fine but it doesn't quite cut it. My question to you is, would you
> recommend Smoothwall 2.0 over IPCop 1.3.0 or vice versa? I don't really want to
> sit down and write my own firewall scripts and web front end when there is
> already a solution.
> 
> I know that IPCop is a fork of Smoothwall but it forked a long time ago. I will
> be playing with both of them in a virtual environment but it may be some time
> before I get that set up and I would like to know if someone already has an
> opinion of one over the other (e.g. this one does this where that one doesn't
> type stuff).


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00077" href="msg00077.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00081.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00091.html">Update:  Re: [ale] eMachines AMD64 notebook</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00081.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00162.html">[ale] Smoothwall 2.0 or IPCop 1.3.0?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00082"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00082"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>