[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Sat Jan 10 12:20:28 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wxvaarl ng ybpnyargfbyhgvbaf.pbz (Xnzrf B. Yvaarl WWW) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] SMB options -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Sat Jan 10 12:20:28 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00374.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00374.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] SMB options</li>
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 11:30, David Hamm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an FTP server sittting on the Internet. One group of users uploads
> files via FTP the other group downloads those files via SMB. Securing SMB
> communications in most cases is handeled by listing the SMB users's IP
> address in an IPTables rule with a -j ACCEPT. But recently I gained an SMB
> user an ALLTel's network and ALLTel blocks port 135. The only options I can
> come up with is eithher FreeSwan or PopTop and from recent experiences I'm
> not excited about using either. I wonder if I could run SMB on another port?
> Under Linux I don't see a problem but the Windows workstations mounting the
> share can't be modified since they also participate in an SMB based LAN. Any
> suggestions are welcomed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
--
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.localnetsolutions.com">http://www.localnetsolutions.com</a>
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00379" href="msg00379.html">[ale] SMB options</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at spinnerdog.com (David Hamm)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00374" href="msg00374.html">[ale] SMB options</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> ale at spinnerdog.com (David Hamm)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00375.html">[ale] curious spam</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00377.html">[ale] curious spam</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00374.html">[ale] SMB options</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00379.html">[ale] SMB options</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00376"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00376"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>