[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Thu Mar 4 14:04:28 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: zuvefpu ng ahoevqtrf.pbz ([vpunry R. Vvefpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel? -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Thu Mar 4 14:04:28 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: mhirsch at nubridges.com (Michael D. Hirsch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00086.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg00077.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00083.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00086.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel?</li>
> So, I looked in /proc/version and lo and behold:
> Linux version 2.4.20-24.9smp
> (bhcompile at porky.devel.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.2.2
> 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)) #1 SMP Mon Dec 1 11:25:17
> EST 2003
>
> So I am wrong. :-)
but helpful--nopw I knwo that "cat /proc/version" is stronger magic than
"uname -a". I also now have confidence that the kernel module I built will
work.
In fact, given that confidence i went and tested again. Yes it does.
Thanks a bunch,
Michael
>
> Michael D. Hirsch wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 March 2004 09:30 am, Dow Hurst wrote:
> >>2.9.5 is what RH9 kernel is compiled with.
> >
> > Thanks, Dow. You don't happen to recall the name of the package that
> > contains that version, do you? I seem to vaguely recall that they had a
> > separate kgcc, or some such, but I don't see it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >>Michael D. Hirsch wrote:
> >>>I'm trying to build a module for my RH 9 system. I'm using the RH
> >>>kernel. The module instructions say to be sure to use the same compiler
> >>>for the module as is used for the kernel.
> >>>
> >>>How can I tell what gcc version RH used? Or does anyone know which one
> >>>they use?
> >>>
> >>>I appear to have gcc 3.2.2 installed. Does RH still compile with 2.9.5,
> >>>or some such?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>Michael
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Ale mailing list
> >>>Ale at ale.org
> >>><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a>
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00077" href="msg00077.html">[ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mhirsch at nubridges.com (Michael D. Hirsch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00083" href="msg00083.html">[ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> mhirsch at nubridges.com (Michael D. Hirsch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00086" href="msg00086.html">[ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel?</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> dhurst at kennesaw.edu (Dow Hurst)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00088.html">[ale] USB mouse and hotplug</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00090.html">[ale] Tonight's Meeting Topic?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00086.html">[ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00084.html">[ale] What gcc for RH 9 kernel?</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00089"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00089"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>