[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Tue Mar 30 12:39:58 2004 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: obo ng irelfrpheryvahk.pbz (Pbo Fbkra) -->
- <!--x-message-id: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Tue Mar 30 12:39:58 2004</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: bob at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg01099.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <<a href="msg01095.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg01098.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg01099.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</li>
> Why would it be a violation of the GPL? If the GPL allows one to sell
> products generally, wouldn't it similarly allow one to sell patches?
It is a violation because the GPL says it's a violation. We had a thread
on this earlier this year.
To summarize, the GPL is nothing more than a software license that says
what you can do with the copyrighted software. A copyright prohibits
copying without permission of the copyright owner (with very few exceptions).
The GPL is the owner's permission and says what can be done.
The GPL says that one may charge a reasonable charge for duplicating. This
generally is interpreted as a reasonable cost for someone's time to copy
and the cost of the media or bandwidth.
> --George
Bob Toxen
bob at verysecurelinux.com [Please use for email to me]
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.verysecurelinux.com">http://www.verysecurelinux.com</a> [Network&Linux/Unix security consulting]
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.realworldlinuxsecurity.com">http://www.realworldlinuxsecurity.com</a> [My book:"Real World Linux Security 2/e"]
Quality Linux & UNIX security and SysAdmin & software consulting since 1990.
"Microsoft: Unsafe at any clock speed!"
-- Bob Toxen 10/03/2002
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01104" href="msg01104.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="01095" href="msg01095.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> Sigmascape1 at cs.com (Sigmascape1 at cs.com)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01098" href="msg01098.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> bob at verysecurelinux.com (Bob Toxen)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="01099" href="msg01099.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> kafka at antichri.st (George Carless)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01101.html">[ale] A fulfilling moment</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg01103.html">[ale] A fulfilling moment</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01099.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg01104.html">[ale] STORY LINK: Vendor slammed for 'selling' patches</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#01102"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#01102"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>