[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Distro Reply

Subject: [ale] Distro Reply
From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
Date: Mon Jan 3 22:01:56 2005
In-reply-to: <1104781281.2410.6.camel@blue>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1104781281.2410.6.camel@blue>

Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 12:41 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> 
> 
>>Stable Debian running a 2.2 kernel.  To me, that is not mature, that is 
>>old.  Personal opinion.
> 
> 
> Stable Debian's focus is stability, not freshness. (NOTE: Debian was
> doing this long before RHEL started doing the same)

Since when was RHEL 2 kernels behind the available stable kernel? 
They're on 2.4 and I believe the next release scheduled for early this 
year will be 2.6.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: james at sumners.ath.cx (James Sumners)

References:
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: jpheale at LearnLink.Emory.Edu (John P. Healey)
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- [ale] Distro Reply
  - From: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)

Prev by Date: [ale] Distro Reply
Next by Date: [ale] Distro Reply
Previous by thread: [ale] Distro Reply
Next by thread: [ale] Distro Reply
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread