[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Linux job

Subject: [ale] Linux job
From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:54:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:35 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> Classified by who?  Microsoft I'm sure.  Does anyone else really 
> consider these to be real time implementations?

Years ago UNIX was considered a real-time system vs what the main frame
is.  The MF is not real-time.  More like job oriented.

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Linux job
  - From: rev.null at gmail.com (Rev. Johnny Healey)

References:
- [ale] Linux job
  - From: vernard at venger.net (Vernard Martin)
- [ale] Linux job
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)
- [ale] Linux job
  - From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)
- [ale] Linux job
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Christopher Fowler)
- [ale] Linux job
  - From: esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)

Prev by Date: [ale] Linux job
Next by Date: [ale] "real-time" (was Linux job)
Previous by thread: [ale] Linux job
Next by thread: [ale] Linux job
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread