[ale] Linux job

[rev.null at gmail.com (Rev. Johnny Healey)]

I thought UNIX and Windows were considered time-sharing.  They allow
multiple users/services to use the system at the same time, but don't offer
the same performance guarantees that a RTOS provides.

On 3/29/06, Christopher Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:35 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> > Classified by who?  Microsoft I'm sure.  Does anyone else really
> > consider these to be real time implementations?
>
> Years ago UNIX was considered a real-time system vs what the main frame
> is.  The MF is not real-time.  More like job oriented.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...