[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
cypherpunks Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
- To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
- Subject: cypherpunks Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
- From: [email protected] (Lee Azzarello)
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:12:55 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1380898319.17441.0.camel@anglachel>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAGkjMSOh3FH_=TGTo4-354MtgLcO2R1nuXnE5vTshN0JOu9SNA@mail.gmail.com> <CADhsnxcWamSE=sZrKW23_fGW7guQ7VrJfM4mnB7Svc=sPgW+ew@mail.gmail.com> <1380898319.17441.0.camel@anglachel>
+1. Mr. Carroll's nonsensical wordsmithing has been awesome from day
one. Big ups indeed. Reminds me of the good old days of the complaint
letter generator. For those who don't know:
http://www.pakin.org/complaint?title=Pres.&firstname=Barack&middlename=H&lastname=Obama&suffix=&gender=m&shorttype=t&pgraphs=5
-lee
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ted Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I now believe this is a programmatically constructed text.
>
> ...which is pretty cypherpunk, have to say. Big up.
>
> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 22:06 -0500, brian carroll wrote:
>> correction on post referenced: did not realize Olek and knitting crew
>> create panels of works or sections prior to visiting sites, which is
>> the only sane explanation for how large scale works are possible, so
>> parallels installation of Christo et Jeanne-Claude; also, artwork
>> Running Fence was mistakenly mentioned as inside/outside boundary,
>> versus here/there or others
>
> --
> Sent from Ubuntu