[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
cypherpunks Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: cypherpunks Digest, Vol 4, Issue 9
- From: [email protected] (Juan Garofalo)
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:12:42 -0300
- In-reply-to: <1380898319.17441.0.camel@anglachel>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAGkjMSOh3FH_=TGTo4-354MtgLcO2R1nuXnE5vTshN0JOu9SNA@mail.gmail.com> <CADhsnxcWamSE=sZrKW23_fGW7guQ7VrJfM4mnB7Svc=sPgW+ew@mail.gmail.com> <1380898319.17441.0.camel@anglachel>
--On Friday, October 04, 2013 10:51 AM -0400 Ted Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I now believe this is a programmatically constructed text.
Well, the messages are rather long, so I wonder if a person is actually
taking the time to write them, but on the other hand, they don't sound
machine-generated to me. The style is recursive and convoluted, but they
seem to make sense. Or perhaps I'm slightly crazy =P
Then again, english is not my native language, so fooling me is probably
not that hard.
>
> ...which is pretty cypherpunk, have to say. Big up.
>
> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 22:06 -0500, brian carroll wrote:
>> correction on post referenced: did not realize Olek and knitting crew
>> create panels of works or sections prior to visiting sites, which is
>> the only sane explanation for how large scale works are possible, so
>> parallels installation of Christo et Jeanne-Claude; also, artwork
>> Running Fence was mistakenly mentioned as inside/outside boundary,
>> versus here/there or others
>
> --
> Sent from Ubuntu
>