[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]

To: [email protected]
Subject: True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
From: [email protected] (James A. Donald)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:34:04 +1000
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti288GVG3OuTfPub1xWgVujkWrvpzk=5GSSgOsv3=bxtxMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2Ti29SwFzmZa2pmhw1ezzQppF3zssU1ySozA5Ga8NC58ar_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJVRA1QTig0hXvekxFtSDp7Px64=cVCk2eq+5nnDtWo97JWBFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti288GVG3OuTfPub1xWgVujkWrvpzk=5GSSgOsv3=bxtxMw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2013-10-25 04:57, grarpamp wrote:
> And per the topic... what was the positive/negative effect in cases where
> that data wasn't available for a request?

Show me the man, and I will find you the crime.

> Who did the encouragement?

Unidentified authority

> Why?

Authority does not answer questions.

And what stick did they wield?

The state

> Were such requests even legal court orders?

Whatever a government employee does is legal, whatever a private citizen 
does is illegal.

References:
- True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
- True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
  - From: [email protected] (coderman)
- True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)

Prev by Date: [cryptography] Fwd: GB Secure Messenger V 06 released
Next by Date: CryptoSeal shutters, ala: LavaBit
Previous by thread: True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
Next by thread: True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread