[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
- To: cpunks <[email protected]>
- Subject: True necessity of Records? [was: CryptoSeal]
- From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 23:29:21 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1SnRGiSJN1_CNeD6UZDiQ4pLC+hyudBizupmv=0QNoE+w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD2Ti29SwFzmZa2pmhw1ezzQppF3zssU1ySozA5Ga8NC58ar_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJVRA1QTig0hXvekxFtSDp7Px64=cVCk2eq+5nnDtWo97JWBFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti288GVG3OuTfPub1xWgVujkWrvpzk=5GSSgOsv3=bxtxMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJVRA1SnRGiSJN1_CNeD6UZDiQ4pLC+hyudBizupmv=0QNoE+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:57 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> the stick was contracts/monies externally
Sure, there's that, especially if smallco wants to do business with bigco.
Two entities on equal footing could certainly negotiate things.
> and legal counsel internally.
Yeah, seems it's always about the legal counsel. Their job is to
tell you about 'risks'. Your job is to make a decision, even if
that decision is to tell them to shut up for once and go prepare
for the risk that you're about to ignore.
https://threatpost.com/simple-bug-exposed-verizon-wireless-users-sms-history
And where are the lawyers telling you that you should probably
*not* keep these records because you're incompetent and the risk
is that someone will sue you individually or as a class when you
screw it up? Probably off cashing the fees you paid them for the
first conversation.