[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DuckDuckGo
- To: rysiek <[email protected]>
- Subject: DuckDuckGo
- From: [email protected] (Jason McVetta)
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:13:50 -0800
- Cc: cpunks <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <1469354.LnzHOKxhlb@lapuntu>
- References: <CAN9H=iL90S6=xp0xVxv5WrHtncjFHjUjce8HRajY8Nty_HHbnw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAN9H=iKNqKwkvKR=5oqj1tCD6GxPciP23i_4kfftgA3gc_QmrQ@mail.gmail.com> <1469354.LnzHOKxhlb@lapuntu>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:32 PM, rysiek <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's true. However, that's still better than Google or Bing, which don't
> even go that far.
>
Is a wolf in sheep's clothing better than an overt wolf?
> What I'm trying to say, I guess, is: it would be nice if we had something
> more
>
to work with than just "some guys on the Internets said that for realz the
> WHOIS showed Annapolis."
>
Fair enough. You have no particular reason to believe me; and a domain
registration address adjacent the Naval Academy doesn't prove anything.
Nevertheless that's why I consider DDG an obvious honeypot. YMMV.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20151130/c6ba2002/attachment.html>