[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DuckDuckGo
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: DuckDuckGo
- From: [email protected] (juan)
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:41:25 -0300
- In-reply-to: <CAO7N=i1Q4Vx5t7CMRRXd-caooMuJ5_1+8qS17GBymiiVK9HgrA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAO7N=i1Q4Vx5t7CMRRXd-caooMuJ5_1+8qS17GBymiiVK9HgrA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 23:22:09 -0800
Ryan Carboni <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_search_engine
>
> There exists distributed search engines if you are truly paranoid.
>
> Duckduckgo's search model is different yes, but right now Bing is
> paying me $5 a month in Amazon gift cards to use their search engine,
> and Google's algorithm is amazing.
LMAO! google used to be *slightly* better than the 'competition'
- now it's garbage.
As a funny side note, gmail's spam filter incorrectly tags
something like 5% of tor-talk messages as spam. The address
[email protected] is a legit address, the addresses
of the messages are legit, I've manually marked more than a
100 messages as NOT SPAM and yet the stupid google cunts can't
'learn' that they are getting it wrong.
It's interesting that such an 'information technology' company
is worth billions of billions and rules the universe....