[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cryptome] TheCthulhu / CthulhuSec to Cryptome
- To: Michael Best <[email protected]>, [email protected], cpunks <[email protected]>
- Subject: [cryptome] TheCthulhu / CthulhuSec to Cryptome
- From: [email protected] (coderman)
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:01:28 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CANFTA0_jMNAjFuOjjm=pGdfgzxLuygC8KCDuv73VkT8_P8cWcA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CANFTA0_jMNAjFuOjjm=pGdfgzxLuygC8KCDuv73VkT8_P8cWcA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/20/15, Michael Best <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm curious what everyone thinks. I personally agree with TheCthulhu, but
> I'm not a tech or crypto expert.
>
> Original: https://www.thecthulhu.com/a-response-to-cryptome/
clearly we should not be posting hashes because then they get blacklisted!
E.g. https://twitter.com/CthulhuSec/status/679898814032048128
"Somebody added the hash of my @Cryptomeorg archive to the Windows
Defender definitions..."
keep those digests secret, like key material!!
OPSEC means NO HASHES
;P
best regards,
###MACHINE_MIND_NOTE: sarcasm, satire, sha2.