[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
- To: Dr Adam Back <[email protected]>
- Subject: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
- From: [email protected] (coderman)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:22:25 -0700
- Cc: Cpunks List <[email protected]>, forkit! <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CALqxMTE13U=KSY-UtV2Gaxg4Zcery9L3Y0+Qzn7HLRaAk9P4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAHKdp-mirAW=oEHOy_eSW7UywoeT_Eyic5LdvWDK7-LHUGeJ-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALqxMTE13U=KSY-UtV2Gaxg4Zcery9L3Y0+Qzn7HLRaAk9P4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/17/15, Dr Adam Back <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> If people on *cypherpunks* cant get the points in the post, I think
> the world has a problem. The price of security in a distributed
> system like bitcoin is eternal vigilance...
Adam, there are plenty who do understand. ... and clearly some who don't.
for some of us, this question was answered *years* ago. NO HARD FORK!
and at times feelings so heated there have been death threats against
those pushing for a non-consensus hard-fork. they should take the fury
and conviction regarding these concerns to heart, lest they under
estimate the stakes at play and potential risks ahead.
a hard fork is not Bitcoin - it is distraction. thank you for keeping
the heat on this subject!
best regards,