[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
- To: Dr Adam Back <[email protected]>
- Subject: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
- From: [email protected] (Sean Lynch)
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:24:14 +0000
- Cc: Cpunks List <[email protected]>, forkit! <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CALqxMTE13U=KSY-UtV2Gaxg4Zcery9L3Y0+Qzn7HLRaAk9P4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAHKdp-mirAW=oEHOy_eSW7UywoeT_Eyic5LdvWDK7-LHUGeJ-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALqxMTE13U=KSY-UtV2Gaxg4Zcery9L3Y0+Qzn7HLRaAk9P4ZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:51 PM Dr Adam Back <[email protected]> wrote:
> If people on *cypherpunks* cant get the points in the post, I think
> the world has a problem. The price of security in a distributed
> system like bitcoin is eternal vigilance, but if people dont
> understand what constitutes a risk and hence what to be vigilant for,
> the meta-system can be unreliable and lose its assurances. I think we
> need to explain some more concepts and probably people will over time
> learn things and and an influencer pyramid emerge as happened in
> privacy technology.
>
>
Yes, I'm sure that when people who disagree with you, it's always because
they are wrong and never because you don't understand the situation as well
as you think you do. I'm sure you know more about Bitcoin than Gavin does.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150618/686eef39/attachment.html>