[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
Randy Bush wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that no
one could actually see the other boxes behind
>> a 7090 :-)
At UCLA Western Data Processing Center (709 - 1090 - 1094) we processed
remote jobs, but card images were transmitted in to a high speed (500
CPS?) paper tape punch, converted to mag tape using an off-line 1401,
and fed to a batch processing OS on the mainframe.
The 7090/94 and a 1410 were connected to a shared 1301 disk drive. I
worked on a 1410 system that replaced the off-line 1401s by putting jobs
on the 1301 and spooling printouts from the 1301 -- no tape mounting and
the 1410 could have multiple card readers and printers. (The 1410,
unlike the 1401, could handle I/O interrupts and it had indirect
addressing). We had lots of hardware hassle -- the 1410 was built by a
different division within IBM than the 1301 and 7000 machines.
Memory lane ...
Lar
- References:
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: johnnyryan1 at gmail.com (Johnny RYAN)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: dhc2 at dcrocker.net (Dave CROCKER)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: spencer at mcsr-labs.org (Spencer Dawkins)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Prev by Date:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Next by Date:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Previous by thread:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Next by thread:
[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
- Index(es):