[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?

Subject: [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
From: lpress at csudh.edu (Larry Press)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:40:23 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <m28whn72l5.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2my63573x.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>


Vint Cerf wrote:

> i was running a Quiktran time sharing system for IBM on an IBM 7044  


More memory lane! I saw Quiktran at IBM Research in Yorktown Heights in 
the early 60s and was blown away -- batch processing was clearly toast. 
    JOSS at RAND was similar.  I was fortunate to be able to use the Q32 
TSS at SDC for my dissertation.

Larry

References:
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
  - From: johnnyryan1 at gmail.com (Johnny RYAN)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
  - From: dhc2 at dcrocker.net (Dave CROCKER)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
  - From: spencer at mcsr-labs.org (Spencer Dawkins)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
  - From: vint at google.com (Vint Cerf)

Prev by Date: [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
Next by Date: [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
Previous by thread: [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
Next by thread: [ih] AT&T, carterfone, the 103, and why didnt BBSs start earlier?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread