[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

an effect of ignoring BCP38

Subject: an effect of ignoring BCP38
From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 05:22:27 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <00d501c90e99$ffb4e480$ff1ead80$@com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

 
seems that some folks in the R&E community, with institutional support
from Cisco, Google, and the US NSF, are exploiting our inability to
take even rudimentary steps toward providing a level of integrity in
routing by teaching students that spoofing IP space is ok.  This whole
thing works at all because so few people use/deploy/maintain BCP-38
compliance.  This was an eye-opener for me.
 
http://www.caida.org/workshops/wide/0808/slides/measuring_reverse_paths.pdf
 

--bill

Follow-Ups:
- an effect of ignoring BCP38
  - From: dsinn at dsinn.com (David Sinn)
- an effect of ignoring BCP38
  - From: kc at caida.org (k claffy)
- an effect of ignoring BCP38
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

References:
- Force10 Gear - Opinions
  - From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)
- Force10 Gear - Opinions
  - From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul Wall)
- Force10 Gear - Opinions
  - From: james at towardex.com (James Jun)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- BCP38 dismissal
  - From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)

Prev by Date: BCP IETFs and RFCs
Next by Date: ingress SMTP
Previous by thread: BCP38 dismissal
Next by thread: an effect of ignoring BCP38
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread