[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Level 3's IRR Database

Subject: Level 3's IRR Database
From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:17:35 -0600
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2sjwa84td.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m21v3t8rtd.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 1/31/2011 12:40 PM, Dongting Yu wrote:

> Would it be classified as invalid or unknown? Or are both possible
> depending on whether 208.65.153.0/24 is signed? Do these two cases
> differ in this particular case?
>

Based on the draft it is invalid, as the shorter covering prefix is 
signed, so the longer prefix will inherit that signing but not be valid.

Jack

References:
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: aa at tenet.ac.za (Andrew Alston)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: carlosm3011 at gmail.com (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: andree+nanog at toonk.nl (Andree Toonk)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: dongting.yu at cl.cam.ac.uk (Dongting Yu)

Prev by Date: Ipv6 for the content provider
Next by Date: Ipv6 for the content provider
Previous by thread: Level 3's IRR Database
Next by thread: Level 3's IRR Database
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread