[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Level 3's IRR Database

Subject: Level 3's IRR Database
From: andree+nanog at toonk.nl (Andree Toonk)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:55:28 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m2sjwa84td.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m21v3t8rtd.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 11-01-31 12:11 PM 
Christopher Morrow wrote:

>> I understand this is by design, but I can imagine some operators will be
>> reluctant to actually drop routes when they start testing RPKI deployments
>> in their networks.
>
> yes, but what is the way forward?

Not sure, that was my original question:
Are there any suggestions or recommendations for how to handle these cases?

Follow-Ups:
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

References:
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: aa at tenet.ac.za (Andrew Alston)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: carlosm3011 at gmail.com (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: andree+nanog at toonk.nl (Andree Toonk)
- Level 3's IRR Database
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

Prev by Date: Level 3's IRR Database
Next by Date: MS-SMB2
Previous by thread: Level 3's IRR Database
Next by thread: Level 3's IRR Database
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread