[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NAT444 or ?
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 04:52:56 PM Leigh Porter
wrote:
> Well if you buy the 'right' solution then you can re-use
> it elsewhere. Many solutions use multi-purpose
> processing cards to deliver NAT functionality which can
> be used for other stuff such as firewalling or some
> other manor of traffic mangling.
You'll be hard-pressed to NOT find a vendor willing to sell
you the "right" solution for the "easy way out" :-).
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110910/e4a0e99e/attachment.bin>
- References:
- NAT444 or ?
- From: sergevautour at yahoo.ca (Serge Vautour)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: seth.mos at dds.nl (Seth Mos)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com (Leigh Porter)