[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NAT444 or ?
On Sep 10, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> GPRS/3G/EDGE has made many a mobile provider especially notorious.
All this problematic state should be broken up into smaller instantiations and distributed as close to the access edge (RAN, wireline, etc.) as possible in order to a) reduce the amount of state concentrated in a single device and b) to minimize the impact footprint when aberrant traffic inevitably fills up the state tables and said devices choke.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
- Follow-Ups:
- NAT444 or ?
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Cameron Byrne)