[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NAT444 or ?
On Sep 10, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> What we've seen also, with some mobile carriers, is that if you ask them to consider distributed IP architectures, they/you quickly realize that IP routing isn't really their core business or skill.
Concur. Many/most have essentially become 'accidental ISPs' through the rise in popularity of iDevices, and some at least are beginning to realize this and to staff and re-engineer accordingly. It takes time, though.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
- References:
- NAT444 or ?
- From: sergevautour at yahoo.ca (Serge Vautour)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- NAT444 or ?
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)