Open Resolver Problems

[fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)]

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 6:38 PM, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>>> I know and I would still argue that they are tantamount to extortion.
>>
>> There is no coercion involved, so, by definition, it can't be called 'extortion'.  If you don't like the AUP, don't sign up for the service - simple as that.
>>
>> Hyperbole isn't generally helpful.
>>
>
> In an oligopoly situation, that's hardly a valid set of choices and is tantamount to extortion.
>

Yeah, I thought so, too, but apparently the FCC and the SEC hasn't
seen it that way for the past 20 years. Go figure.  :-)

- ferg


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com