[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Open Resolver Problems

Subject: Open Resolver Problems
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:58:22 -0700
In-reply-to: <CANQy6FZmFfOTMXawgAM+xm9gb0Hs4TViK=k1-MLnhPJoD7uzSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A7B8F84D333A7948AB7F860A8A68E25D0137BFCE@terminator.net2atlanta.local> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANQy6FZmFfOTMXawgAM+xm9gb0Hs4TViK=k1-MLnhPJoD7uzSw@mail.gmail.com>

> Yeah, I thought so, too, but apparently the FCC and the SEC hasn't
> seen it that way for the past 20 years. Go figure.  :-)
> 

The FCC doesn't understand that 4Mbps customer-facing speed on the tail circuit alone does NOT define broadband in a meaningful way.

The SEC does not understand that IPv4 risk and the lack of an IPv6 strategy should be a required risk consideration in a Sarbanes Oxley filing.

I have little hope that these particular federal agencies will ever agree with me about such nuanced issues.

Owen

References:
- FW: Open Resolver Problems
  - From: milt at net2atlanta.com (Milt Aitken)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Open Resolver Problems
  - From: fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)

Prev by Date: Open Resolver Problems
Next by Date: Open Resolver Problems
Previous by thread: Open Resolver Problems
Next by thread: Open Resolver Problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread