[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]

Subject: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:13:03 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:28:07 -0700." <[email protected]>
References: <CAB_zYdLuMntEdyU=UJgz8saGyA_Cq2-Y-UrM5=XnOPmvJ9=X6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=Zqvy+HbyEvLoyUgcvTn9BvmfoEXVfUfosPS3Aef4e34Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLabok0wUrYWN-CL2w_UEKJV4T+oGZTKDVWGkhAb=5qaEqQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <m2ip4mzkf3.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=bu5GaenmyZm8UzD85H+_2Wa_2y8BOCHkcCGOQ0_-CT+w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <8C04311D-EF9! 5! [email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:28:07 -0700, Owen DeLong said:

> A reliable cost-effective means for FTL signaling is a hard problem without
> a known solution.

Agreed.

> An idiot-proof simple BGP configuration is a well known solution. Automating
> it would be relatively simple if there were the will to do so.

As others pointed out, a reliable cost effective way of automating the layer
8 problems is *also* a hard problem without a known solution.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130325/423f5691/attachment.bin>

References:
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: jlewis at lewis.org (Jon Lewis)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: arturo.servin at gmail.com (Arturo Servin)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: aledm at qix.co.uk (Aled Morris)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- [c-nsp] DNS amplification
  - From: aledm at qix.co.uk (Aled Morris)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: sethm at rollernet.us (Seth Mattinen)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: Open Resolver Problems
Next by Date: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Previous by thread: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Next by thread: Is multihoming hard? [was: DNS amplification]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread