[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
- Subject: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
- From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:22:08 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAHDzDLA=O9f7si6VZiZyr=B+HShvW0eztYPExNd7fPuhmE3-tw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAHDzDLA=O9f7si6VZiZyr=B+HShvW0eztYPExNd7fPuhmE3-tw@mail.gmail.com>
On 18/01/2014 04:09, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
> Does anyone have any experiences or insights to share on how more (or
> less) efficient routing is with IPv6? Any specific thoughts with respect to
> how the following characteristics help or not with routing efficiency?
> - fixed header size
> - Extension header chain
> - flow labels in header
> - no intermediate fragmentation
> - no checksums
extension headers are a poor idea because it's troublesome to process them
on cheap hardware. Because of this, packets with any sort of extension
headers are routinely dropped by a large percentage of organisations. Flow
labels are generally unused (i.e. set to zero by many host stacks).
Nick