[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
- Subject: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
- From: mukom.tamon at gmail.com (Mukom Akong T.)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:00:44 +0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAHDzDLA=O9f7si6VZiZyr=B+HShvW0eztYPExNd7fPuhmE3-tw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> extension headers are a poor idea because it's troublesome to process them
> on cheap hardware.
>
Have you found them to be more troublesome to process than IPv4 options
are/were?
> Because of this, packets with any sort of extension
> headers are routinely dropped by a large percentage of organisations. Flow
> labels are generally unused (i.e. set to zero by many host stacks).
>
--
Mukom Akong T.
http://about.me/perfexcellence | twitter: @perfexcellent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
?When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the
hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------