[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency

Subject: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
From: joelja at bogus.com (joel jaeggli)
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 10:55:33 -0800
In-reply-to: <AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE7632941D00C@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet.us>
References: <CAHDzDLA=O9f7si6VZiZyr=B+HShvW0eztYPExNd7fPuhmE3-tw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE7632941D00C@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet.us>

On 1/18/14, 10:30 AM, John van Oppen wrote:
> This is exactly what pushed us into 6PE...   it was the only way to make performance similar to v4 from a routing standpoint.

This statement is a bit facile... What platform are you referring to?

> John @ AS11404
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140118/8a4b6bc5/attachment.bin>

Follow-Ups:
- Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
  - From: jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us (John van Oppen)

References:
- Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
  - From: mukom.tamon at gmail.com (Mukom Akong T.)
- Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
  - From: jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us (John van Oppen)

Prev by Date: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
Next by Date: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes
Previous by thread: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
Next by thread: Experiences with IPv6 and Routing Efficiency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread