best practice for advertising peering fabric routes

[martin.pels at ams-ix.net (Martin Pels)]

Hello Leo,

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:18:13 -0600
Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:

> This whole problem smacks to me of exchange points that are "too big to fail".  Since some of these exchanges are so big, everyone else must bend to their needs.  I think the world would be a better place if some of these were broken up into smaller exchanges and they imposed less restrictions on their participants.

You forgot to add "and would break down on a weekly basis".

The restrictions that IXPs impose on their customers have nothing to do with
the size of their peering LAN, but everything with offering a reliable service
to these same customers.

Kind regards,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140118/4e25626d/attachment.bin>