[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DDOS solution recommendation
- Subject: DDOS solution recommendation
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:09:47 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:29:33 +0700." <[email protected]>
- References: <25342930.1994.1420989680127.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <[email protected]>
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 22:29:33 +0700, "Roland Dobbins" said:
>
> On 11 Jan 2015, at 22:21, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> > I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong, I'm saying whatever the
> > industry as a whole is doing obviously isn't working and perhaps a
> > different approach is required.
>
> You haven't recommended anything new, and you really need to do some
> reading in order to understand why it isn't as simple as you seem to
> think it is.
Sounds like RFC1925, section 4 should be top of the list?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150111/9aee5b07/attachment.pgp>