[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX

Subject: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: shopik+lists at nvcube.net (Nikolay Shopik)
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:15:56 +0300
In-reply-to: <CALgsdbfkth3YXg6xzUoOhRzkobgGie5i0f4uq-f2cjFFSF8dWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7ApSOtGJg_E+LECSA83qVmVEeG82cbrfX_5M22KPGr57Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALgsdbfkth3YXg6xzUoOhRzkobgGie5i0f4uq-f2cjFFSF8dWg@mail.gmail.com>

Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based.

On 29/02/16 10:26, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> Cisco do not support this protocol at all (that's pretty weird,
> really).

References:
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: todd.crane at n5tech.com (Todd Crane)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
  - From: pavel.odintsov at gmail.com (Pavel Odintsov)

Prev by Date: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Next by Date: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Previous by thread: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Next by thread: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread