[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Standards for last mile performance
- Subject: Standards for last mile performance
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 10:46:36 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAC6=tfaPaYn4zoVUHwire6OmmgtxkOqC=X_K_PShEAT9kSYOzg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaPaYn4zoVUHwire6OmmgtxkOqC=X_K_PShEAT9kSYOzg@mail.gmail.com>
On 30/Apr/16 20:36, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller
> splits.. 1x16. Some are doing 1x2's or 1x4's at the corner somewhere into
> 1x16's or 1x8's, so at the point where you start to hit decent saturation
> you can just shrink the upstream split and fuse onto a new upstream strand
> / optic. Once that gets overused, thankfully you can overlay NG-PON2.
If you're being this aggressive, and then having to re-invest in the
next PON standard, isn't the case for Active-E being made more and more?
Mark.